Sacramento Crotch Rockets

Go Back   Sacramento Crotch Rockets > Manufacturers Motorcycles > European Manufacturers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2009, 12:31 PM   #21
drftsub
scr med" not new not old
 
drftsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Orangevale
Posts: 719
Your bike: 05 zx6r, 02 F4i, 01 RS50
First Name: Nate
Default

Id say the fact that it is physically smaller, much more narrow than a typical 600, heavier internal components will attribute to the engines characteristics more than overall vehicle weight ( and the fact that even tho the pistons etc are heavier due to the larger bore there is still only 3 )

just my $.02
drftsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 05:55 PM   #22
Busy Little Shop
Have a wheelie nice day
 
Busy Little Shop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sac
Posts: 467
Your bike: Honda RC45 RC30
First Name: Larry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G Money View Post
So Larry, I believe what you are saying here is that if we took a set engine displacement that a 4 cylinder would be able to produce more power than the 3 cylinder configuration correct? (along with being easier to tune, and a potentially higher revving engine)
Correct...

Quote:
Originally Posted by G Money View Post
I did see where Triumph has in some way produced a slightly larger engine in a 675 but has also managed to keep their bike 20 lbs lighter. Any ideas on what this would be attributed to? or is it just that its a smaller pistoned engine (3 cylinder instead of 4) / less parts, smaller block etc? or do you think the weight savings comes from other lighter components (frame, swingarm, wheels etc...)
Where did you get 20 pounds lighter??? quote SportRider on actual dry and wet weights...


675 Triumph.......389 417
Yamaha R6.........396 423
Suzuki GSXR600 411 438
Kawasaki ZX6....403 430
Kawasaki 636.....404 431
Honda CBR600....402 431

I think you'll find that the weight savings are components rather than engine...

Last edited by Busy Little Shop; 11-09-2009 at 09:07 PM.
Busy Little Shop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 09:21 AM   #23
G Money
"OG" SCR Member
 
G Money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Sac
Posts: 2,852
Your bike: 03 636, 05 Busa
First Name: G.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Little Shop View Post
Correct...



Where did you get 20 pounds lighter??? quote SportRider on actual dry and wet weights...


675 Triumph.......389 417
Yamaha R6.........396 423
Suzuki GSXR600 411 438
Kawasaki ZX6....403 430
Kawasaki 636.....404 431
Honda CBR600....402 431

I think you'll find that the weight savings are components rather than engine...

I was comparing the dry and wet weight of the 675 to the GSXR 600 which I thought was typically one of the lighter bikes.... I guess I'm a little outdated. But even by your numbers the triumph is about 20 lbs lighter.

675 Triumph.......389 417
Suzuki GSXR600 411 438
G Money is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 08:36 PM   #24
decipral
SCR Veteran
 
decipral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Elk Grove
Posts: 218
Your bike: 06' Triumph Daytona 675
First Name: KC
Default

I'm new here, but I own a Graphite 675. It was a blind purchase and the best one ever made. I LOVE this bike, the handling is tops and the stock tires are Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro which makes for nice traction. Tq is right from the get go. I did a dyno breakin and came out with a reading of 114 HP and 51 ft lbs of tq.

It may not have the top end that the jap 6's do but that doesnt matter for street. As for track, the jap mfs have the money to put into r and d. This is still a relatively new model and it is just starting to gain popularity in the aftermarket scene which has affected its racing development
__________________
decipral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2009, 08:59 PM   #25
Hoologan
Administrator
 
Hoologan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Uranus
Posts: 4,968
Your bike: GSXR600, DL1000
First Name: Logan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by decipral View Post
... it is just starting to gain popularity in the aftermarket scene which has affected its racing development
The AMA cleared the 675cc triple for racing in the Formula Xtreme class starting in 2007 and didn't have a factory backed racing team until 2008, in the British Supersport Series. When people start racing the bikes, the aftermarket starts developing cool parts.
__________________
"By working faithfully eight hours a day, you may eventually be a boss and work twelve hours a day" - Robert Frost
Hoologan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 05:33 AM   #26
decipral
SCR Veteran
 
decipral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Elk Grove
Posts: 218
Your bike: 06' Triumph Daytona 675
First Name: KC
Default

Since it was a new model in 2006, it took quite a while to get anything made for it aftermarket wise. From windscreens to slip on exhausts. Not to mention the cost factor. Which is easily double the price from most of the jap 4 aftermarket bits. Triumph did not even want a factory team due to the R & D costs and other financial demands. You are correct that with people interested in racing it the parts will come. But a factory backing from the get go and solid affordable parts would've made the entry of this bike way easier.

And like I said it is still a relatively new model with only 4 yrs under its belt. The first unveiling was in Sep 2005, when I put a deposit down to hold a bike from the small shipment to the U.S. there wasn't even a floor model to look at.
__________________
decipral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2010, 01:00 AM   #27
aprilia rider
A Dragon With SSA
 
aprilia rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Reno
Posts: 213
Your bike: aprilia,SV650,GSXR750,ZX9
First Name: Jerome
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacerX (aka E!) View Post
I'd rock one
Come on E. It has 2 wheels. Of course you'd rock it.
__________________
Jerome (A Dragon with SSA)
aprilia rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2010, 01:53 PM   #28
Busy Little Shop
Have a wheelie nice day
 
Busy Little Shop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sac
Posts: 467
Your bike: Honda RC45 RC30
First Name: Larry
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by decipral View Post
I LOVE this bike, the handling is tops and the stock tires are Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro which makes for nice traction.
Are you sure they are the Pro and not the SP??? SP stands for Sport Production... see pic

You're looking at the Pirelli's that come stock on some Ducati 848 and Triumph 675
and are labled 'SP' or sport production compound... they are only available
through a Ducati dealer or Parts Unlimited... Most importantly they are
designed for the street and the temperature ranges you would expect to
encounter on the street... I paid $600.00 for set and never regretted the
cost...

What they deliver is the best of both worlds... the DOT race tire's accuracy
of line and confidence in grip... coupled with the Street tire's envelope that
has been stretched so that it reaches the operating temperature range
earlier... plus it operates over a wide temperate range plus unlimited heat
cycles...

Mr.RC45's 180/55 Pirelli street tire... someday I'll take them to track...
Busy Little Shop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2010, 09:26 PM   #29
decipral
SCR Veteran
 
decipral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Elk Grove
Posts: 218
Your bike: 06' Triumph Daytona 675
First Name: KC
Default

When I purchased my bike. It came stock with the Pirelli Dragon Supercorsa Pro's and not the SP.
__________________
decipral is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.